<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Loans and Mortgage Tips &#187; credit cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loans-assistant.com/tag/credit-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loans-assistant.com</link>
	<description>Professional loans assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 21:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Liquidity and payday loans traders</title>
		<link>/liquidity-and-payday-loans-traders/</link>
		<comments>/liquidity-and-payday-loans-traders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get out of debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loans-assistant.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sunshine trading We assume that information on the identity of some uninformed traders is made public or is known by the other market participants, and that their trading strategies are being pre-announced, which means that the size of the orders they will submit at a certain time in the near future is disclosed. The idea [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Sunshine trading We assume that information on the identity of some uninformed traders is made public or is known by the other market participants, and that their trading strategies are being pre-announced, which means that the size of the orders they will submit at a certain time in the near future is disclosed. The idea behind this practice is that by pre-announcing, uninformed traders should have lower adverse selection costs; essentially, market-makers should reduce the costs for the orders that they recognize as uninformed. Admati and Pfleiderer (1991) call the pre-announcement of uninformed traders’ orders ‘sunshine trading’. They study the effects of pre-announcement, assuming a market similar to the competitive protocol of Grossman and Stiglitz (1980). Here, however, we analyse the efficacy of sunshine trading in the Kyle-type framework in which agents behave strategically; the Grossman–Stiglitz framework is left for the discussion of anonymity in section 10.1.2. The model used here differs from Kyle’s standard model discussed in section 3.3.2 in that it has two types of liquidity trader: those who pre-announce orders and those who do not. By pre-announcing, liquidity traders disclose themselves as uninformed before trading starts; those who do not pre-announce do not reveal their type. The purpose of the model is to determine the effects of pre-announcement on market quality and traders’ welfare. Which traders will take the other side of uninformed traders’ pre-announced orders is also in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/liquidity-and-payday-loans-traders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credit or your personal savings?</title>
		<link>/credit-or-your-personal-savings/</link>
		<comments>/credit-or-your-personal-savings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get out of debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loans-assistant.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shoestring Budget™ inventing does not mean cost-free inventing. If only that were the case! It means that you must contribute, at least some of your own money, to the project. You may be saying, “But, I don’t have any money!” If that is the case, then you might as well stop now. Almost anyone can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Shoestring Budget™ inventing does not mean cost-free inventing. If only that were the case! It means that you must contribute, at least some of your own money, to the project. You may be saying, “But, I don’t have any money!” If that is the case, then you might as well stop now. Almost anyone can tap into savings or plan for future expenditures by saving small amounts as they can for something that is really important to them. As we mentioned in an earlier chapter, an inventing project does not require that you have the entire amount at the start. It is very possible to pay for your invention in segments as you move through the steps. In fact, that is the way it must be done since product development, protection and marketing take place over a somewhat extended period of time and the expenditures are made in different areas, such as prototyping, legal, and so on.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">When we were first inventing our product, Ghostline ®, we were the epitome of Shoestring Budget™ inventors. We were a couple of wives and mothers who were working full time jobs and we did not have a lot of expendable income. We did have faith in our idea; enough faith to dip into our savings to get our first prototypes made. We did it in bits and pieces.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">First, we each contributed about $200, when that money was exhausted we each dipped into our savings again to replenish our “company fund” in order to have the money to continue the prototyping process. Thankfully, our first visits to patent attorneys were free (we interviewed several patent attorneys before selecting one) but when the time came to start the patent application we each dipped into our family savings again. If you truly have faith in the potential of your idea, you will be willing to invest at least some of your own money. If you do not have enough faith in your idea to put your money, even if it is limited, where your mouth is, stop now. Do not waste your time or anyone else’s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/credit-or-your-personal-savings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which credit fits your investment project best</title>
		<link>/which-credit-fits-your-investment-project-best/</link>
		<comments>/which-credit-fits-your-investment-project-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business objectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loans-assistant.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using the patents that are most similar to your invention, click on the link for each patent that is listed under “References Cited.” This is the prior art that has been listed as being the most similar to that patent. This is where you will find the patents that are similar, regardless of when they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Using the patents that are most similar to your invention, click on the link for each patent that is listed under “References Cited.” This is the prior art that has been listed as being the most similar to that patent. This is where you will find the patents that are similar, regardless of when they were issued. Often you will find patents dating back many years in this section. Examine each of those carefully, looking at the images if you need to, in order to understand how they are similar or dissimilar to your idea. If you continue to pursue your invention and a patent application is filed, some of these same patents may be cited as prior art on your application. Look at the classification numbers on these patents to make sure that you have not missed one that should be checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/which-credit-fits-your-investment-project-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SECURITIZATION OF CONVENTIONAL SMALL BUSINESS LOANS</title>
		<link>/securitization-of-conventional-small-business-loans/</link>
		<comments>/securitization-of-conventional-small-business-loans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loans-assistant.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While there are a few differences, the structures for conventional small business loan transactions are similar to those of the unguaranteed portions of SBA 7(a) loans. One distinction is the excess spread available. Note, for 7(a) transactions, excess spread from the entire loan is available with only the unguaranteed portion being securitized, where for conventional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">While there are a few differences, the structures for conventional small business loan transactions are similar to those of the unguaranteed portions of SBA 7(a) loans. One distinction is the excess spread available. Note, for 7(a) transactions, excess spread from the entire loan is available with only the unguaranteed portion being securitized, where for conventional business loans the entire loan is in the transaction.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conventional small business loans are also made to “qualifying borrowers,” whereas the eligibility requirement of SBA loans is for borrowers that cannot obtain this financing. Therefore, the quality of conventional small business loans is generally better than SBA loans.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The average loan balance for conventional business loans for the most part will be higher than the SBA due to a lack of SBA limits on loan size. Also recall that SBA loans are typically floaters indexed to the prime rate. Conventional loans tend to be indexed to three-month LIBOR because the investment community prefers LIBOR floating rate bonds. Indexing the underlying collateral to the same index mitigates basis risk. SBA transactions have basis risk; however, the rating agencies take this into consideration when specifying levels of credit enhancement for deals.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Large portions of conventional loans are secured by first liens on real commercial property. Transactions will often consist of pools of loans backed almost completely by real estate collateral. When the loan is not backed by real estate, losses on defaulted loans will typically be higher due to the lack of real estate collateral, which is generally an appreciating asset, versus collateral such as equipment, which is a depreciating asset.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Prepayment penalties for conventional loans tend to be more severe than the SBA. Penalties are set by the lender and will likely start at 5% and step down one percentage point per year for the first five years following disbursements.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">SBA transactions are generally more geographically diverse than conventional transactions. Forty-eight states could be represented in an SBA transaction where conventional transactions may contain only eight with around 70% of loan concentration in one state. Small business performance is negatively affected by downturns in economic cycles; the geographic diversity of SBA transactions lessens some of this risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/securitization-of-conventional-small-business-loans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to Look for: Loan Size/Concentration</title>
		<link>/what-to-look-for-loan-sizeconcentration/</link>
		<comments>/what-to-look-for-loan-sizeconcentration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loans-assistant.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The loan size varies from $1 million to, more recently, greater than $1.5 billion. Smaller loans allow for greater diversification and less credit risk, yet they are more difficult to analyze. Large-loan deals are typically purchased by buy-and-hold accounts, such as insurance companies and pension funds with real estate expertise, and often are preferred by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The loan size varies from $1 million to, more recently, greater than $1.5 billion. Smaller loans allow for greater diversification and less credit risk, yet they are more difficult to analyze. Large-loan deals are typically purchased by buy-and-hold accounts, such as insurance companies and pension funds with real estate expertise, and often are preferred by these “real estate-savvy investors” as it is economical to spend the time analyzing the property.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Smaller loan deals (conduit) are more liquid and are typically purchased by total-return, mark-to-market investors that, lacking real estate experience, are more apt to rely on diversification and the rating agencies’ analysis and judgment.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Fusion deals, presently the most common type of CMBS deal, are “lumpy” conduit deals. Generally, a fusion deal has a few large loans that are typically shadow-rated investment-grade loans that are combined with a diverse pool of conduit loans. They grew in popularity after 9/11, which shut down the single-asset and large-loan type CMBS deals due to concerns that the risk of a terrorist act against one large property was too great. As a result, these large loans were split up and portions placed into various CMBS, thereby creating fusion deals. Much focus is placed on the top 10 and top 20 loans in any given deal as these can have a substantial influence on performance.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Concentration is important because it is sometimes difficult for the rating agencies to predict commercial loan defaults. The rating agencies use measures to score loan concentration and, accordingly, require more or less credit enhancement. For example, Moody’s uses the Herfindahl index to determine the effective number of loans within a pool. A pool of 100 loans that had a Herfindahl index of 65 indicates that the pool has an effective diversity of 65 loans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/what-to-look-for-loan-sizeconcentration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loans and Increased complexity</title>
		<link>/loans-and-increased-complexity/</link>
		<comments>/loans-and-increased-complexity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bakning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loans-assistant.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greater complexity in loan workouts is a result of increased diversity, both in the participants involved in financing companies and in the nature of financial claims. Traditional bilateral banking relationships are being replaced by more transaction-based financing arrangements, including the direct access to investors in the capital markets. As a result, when corporate distress occurs, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Greater complexity in loan workouts is a result of increased diversity, both in the participants involved in financing companies and in the nature of financial claims. Traditional bilateral banking relationships are being replaced by more transaction-based financing arrangements, including the direct access to investors in the capital markets. As a result, when corporate distress occurs, there is a very wide range of institutions that become involved in support operations. Potentially conflicting objectives from a wide spectrum of financiers, including venture capitalists, credit insurers, institutional and retail bondholders and vulture funds, can be difficult to reconcile. At the same time, the complexity of companies’ legal structures and financial management activities results in a loss of transparency. Considerable effort is required to unravel financing arrangements if such companies encounter difficulties. The process of determining the prioritisation and negotiating strengths of the different claims on a company’s assets is hampered, causing uncertainty among the participants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/loans-and-increased-complexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
